The Urgency of the Good Governance Principle in Protection and management of the environment: Case Study of Sepat Reservoir Surabaya

Amir, Nabbilah (2018) The Urgency of the Good Governance Principle in Protection and management of the environment: Case Study of Sepat Reservoir Surabaya. In: 1st International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies (ICILS 2018), 25 July 2018, Semarang.

[thumbnail of Nabbilah Amir_The Urgency of Principle of Good Governance.pdf] PDF
Nabbilah Amir_The Urgency of Principle of Good Governance.pdf

Download (1MB)
Official URL / DOI:


Transfer of Land Functions in Indonesia increasingly shows a graph of rapid increase even uncontrolled, mainly in the conversion of agricultural land into residential land. Increased settlement needs are based on an increase in the population of an area, as happened in the city of Surabaya, the conversion of functions becomes one of the steps to meet the primary needs of the community, namely settlements. In addition, the need for public facilities to meet the secondary needs of the community, however, land conversion is always the origin of environmental damage. Therefore this study aims to find out and analyze the consequences of the conversion of the sepat reservoir area involving the Surabaya City government with the company PT. CS became a luxury housing area and made the sepat reservoir as part of its yard, which had an impact on the closure of the sepat reservoir. This study uses empirical legal research methods and uses a case approach method. The results of this study indicate that there are legal implications of the lack of transparency in the public administration documents of the sepat reservoir, fearing that it would lead to a bad precedent for the administration of government in the city of Surabaya. Implementation of good governance principles by opening the sepat reservoir public administration document in order to provide a sense of security and foster the trust of the Surabaya City residents to the Government. The result of the study after the analysis was found there was an omission by the Surabaya city government on the sepat reservoir case, considering that there had been a civil agreement to exchange the sepat reservoir with the Gelora Bung Tomo (GBT) land which had been going on for a long time and if the government made unilateral blocking then it would civil disputes arose between Surabaya city government and PT.CS.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Good Governance, Environmental, Over Land Function
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Ester Sri W. 196039
Date Deposited: 31 Jul 2018 04:53
Last Modified: 17 Dec 2021 07:18

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item