Kewenangan pengadilan dalam membatalkan sertipikathak atas tanah yang telah diterbitkan lebih dari lima tahun

Djati, Amalya (2020) Kewenangan pengadilan dalam membatalkan sertipikathak atas tanah yang telah diterbitkan lebih dari lima tahun. Jurnal Media Hukum dan Peradilan, 6 (1). pp. 11-27. ISSN 2654-8178 (Online); 2442-7829 (Print)

[thumbnail of Amalya Djati_KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN_2020.pdf]
Preview
PDF
Amalya Djati_KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN_2020.pdf

Download (185kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 7. LoA Makalah(5).pdf]
Preview
PDF
7. LoA Makalah(5).pdf

Download (175kB) | Preview
Official URL / DOI: https://ejournal-pps.unsuri.id/index.php/jmhp/arti...

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the strength of evidence of certificates of land rights before the court and analyze the ratio of decisions of judges who cancel certificates of land rights that have been issued for more than 5 (five) years. Thetype of research is normative juridical, using the statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach. From the results of research and discussion found First: certificate of land rights that have been issued for more than 5 (five) years and meet the elements stipulated in Article 32 paragraph (2) Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration has absolute proof power can not be cancelled. Second: the 2 (two) court decisions reviewed show that the strength of proof of certificate of land rights even though it has fulfilled the elements as evidence that has absolute power and cannot be canceled, but in fact the certificate of land rights can still be canceled by the court. In the first case examined, the judge gave consideration in responding to the Defendant's exception stating that Article 32 paragraph (2) was the domain / scope of the state administrative court, while the object of the dispute was a dispute over ownership so the exception was rejected. In the second review that was reviewed, the Supreme Court gave legal considerations that the application of Article 32 paragraph (2) did not provide a sense of justice, so the Supreme Court ruled out the validity of Article 32 paragraph (2) and canceled the certificate of rights that had been issued more than 5 (five) year because it is considered a juridical defect.Keywords: land registration, certificate of land rights, strength of proofPENDAHULUANPemerintah ditugaskan oleh negara untuk melayani pendaftaran tanah di seluruh Indonesia yang oleh Pasal 19 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Pokok-Pokok Agraria (selanjutnya disebut UUPA) bertujuan tunggal yaitu untuk menjamin kepastian hukum. Amanat Pasal 19 UUPA tersebut kemudian diimplementasikan untuk pertamakalinya dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 1961 (selanjutnya disebut PP 10/1961) dan kemudian diperbaharui dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah (selanjutnya disebut

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: land registration, certificate of land rights, strength of proof
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Postgraduate Programs > Master Program in Notary
Depositing User: Eko Setiawan 194014
Date Deposited: 04 Sep 2020 09:32
Last Modified: 24 Mar 2021 16:26
URI: http://repository.ubaya.ac.id/id/eprint/38081

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item