Kedudukan Hukum CCTV Sebagai Alat Bukti Elektronik Setelah Terbitnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016 Tanggal 07 September 2016

Khristanto, Takasya Angela Tanauw (2020) Kedudukan Hukum CCTV Sebagai Alat Bukti Elektronik Setelah Terbitnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016 Tanggal 07 September 2016. Jurnal Hukum To-ra, 6 (2). pp. 145-155. ISSN 2442-8019; e-ISSN 2620-9837

PDF Takasya Angela_KEDUDUKAN HUKUM CCTV.pdf Download (800kB)

Abstract

KUHAP as the basis of the implementing Criminal Code Procedure in Indonesia governs that there are 5 valid evidence tools, namely: witness testimony, expert testimony, letters, instructions and information of the defendant. But in its development there are other evidence that is considered legitimate known as electronic evidence tool. CCTV (Closed Circuit Television) is a form of electronic evidence tool that is considered valid according to the law, but after the issuance of Constitutional Court ruling No. 20/PUU-XIV/2016 dated September 07, 2016 which "restricts" the status of CCTV as a legitimate electronic evidence tool, causing uncertainties evidence in court.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	CCTV, Evidence Tool, Legal Position
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User:	Ester Sri W. 196039
Date Deposited:	29 Nov 2022 09:26
Last Modified:	29 Nov 2022 09:26
URI:	http://repository.ubaya.ac.id/id/eprint/42906

Actions (login required)

View Item